Mountain Grove Invitational

Date: Saturday, March 26, 2022
Host: Mountain Grove High School (Mountain Grove, MO)
Scoring Rules: NAQT without Interrupts

Players are ranked by their PP20TUH (points per 20 tossups heard) in the preliminary rounds of the tournament. Ties are broken by their power percentage (P%).

Competitive Division: IS-207A

# Player Team GP TUH P TU P% PP20TUH
1 Chase SponenbergKickapoo A 9 180 34 43 44.2% 104.44
2 Nathan SwensonKickapoo B 9 180 20 38 34.5% 75.56
3 Andy DurhamHouston A 9 180 22 24 47.8% 63.33
4 Caden HausteinKickapoo A 9 180 22 22 50.0% 61.11
5 Bennie Lee Cook IIIHouston A 9 180 16 30 34.8% 60.00
6 Nate DarbySalem A 9 180 9 31 22.5% 49.44
6 Emily HoneycuttHouston B 9 180 5 37 11.9% 49.44
8 Hyrum BlauWaynesville A 9 180 11 27 28.9% 48.33
9 Kolten WiegersEugene A 9 180 10 26 27.8% 45.56
10 Dorian KoshyomynGreenwood Laboratory 9 180 3 28 9.7% 36.11
11 Karli HedgeClever A 9 180 6 23 20.7% 35.56
12 Devon SawyerHouston A 9 180 12 13 48.0% 34.44
13 Tyler LawsonHouston B 9 180 6 20 23.1% 32.22
14 Caden AndersonEugene A 9 180 3 23 11.5% 30.56
15 Ryan McFailClever A 9 180 7 16 30.4% 29.44
16 C. J. WearsKickapoo B 9 180 7 15 31.8% 28.33
17 Sagan WilsonEugene B 9 180 2 18 10.0% 23.33
18 Tyler SchellhammerSalem A 9 180 6 11 35.3% 22.22
19 Mary GabrielGreenwood Laboratory 4 70 2 4 33.3% 20.00
20 Millie SappClever A 9 180 1 14 6.7% 17.22
21 Dave OwsleyKickapoo B 3 60 2 2 50.0% 16.67
22 Nate BowlesClever A 9 180 2 10 16.7% 14.44
23 Justin IriarteWaynesville A 9 180 1 11 8.3% 13.89
24 David EastmanHouston B 9 180 2 8 20.0% 12.22
25 Kyle RamakerKickapoo B 9 180 1 8 11.1% 10.56
25 Lancey SchubbeWaynesville A 9 180 1 8 11.1% 10.56
27 Joseph BlauWaynesville A 9 180 1 7 12.5% 9.44
28 Sarray SchulteEugene B 9 180 0 8 0.0% 8.89
29 Jamie AlfordGreenwood Laboratory 9 140 0 6 0.0% 8.57
30 Joel SharpsteenKickapoo A 9 180 3 3 50.0% 8.33
30 Katelyn PetersonEugene B 9 180 1 6 14.3% 8.33
32 Lilly ScheligaHouston B 9 180 2 4 33.3% 7.78
33 Zoe LevasseurEugene A 9 180 0 5 0.0% 5.56
34 Keerti VittalamGreenwood Laboratory 8 110 0 3 0.0% 5.45
35 Myles RameyKickapoo A 9 180 1 3 25.0% 5.00
36 Eleanor HilitonGreenwood Laboratory 9 130 0 3 0.0% 4.62
37 Dylan SeabaughSalem A 9 180 0 4 0.0% 4.44
38 Abby McBrideSalem A 9 180 0 2 0.0% 2.22
39 Pearl EvansGreenwood Laboratory 7 90 0 0 0.0% 0.00

Standard Division: IS-207A

# Player Team GP TUH P TU P% PP20TUH
1 Cole CoursenSalem B 9 180 8 47 14.5% 65.56
2 Shafer MullinsThayer A 9 180 7 46 13.2% 62.78
3 Maxwell JenningsClever B 9 180 12 36 25.0% 60.00
4 Camdyn KempfMountain Grove 9 180 2 39 4.9% 46.67
5 Mick DreckerMountain Grove 9 180 4 32 11.1% 42.22
6 Alexander GlackinRichland 9 170 0 31 0.0% 36.47
7 Matt PierceThayer B 9 180 1 26 3.7% 30.56
8 Aidan TessaroParkview 9 180 0 27 0.0% 30.00
8 Grace ParkerWaynesville B 9 180 0 27 0.0% 30.00
10 Leti GovoniClever C 9 180 2 21 8.7% 26.67
11 Nick MaddenWaynesville B 9 180 3 18 14.3% 25.00
12 Lauren DavisClever C 9 180 2 19 9.5% 24.44
13 Darcee JensenRichland 9 120 1 12 7.7% 22.50
14 Marcus WinrodGainesville 9 180 0 20 0.0% 22.22
15 Audie HainesClever B 9 180 0 16 0.0% 17.78
16 Brianna CaldwellThayer A 9 180 1 13 7.1% 16.11
17 Tessa CampbellWaynesville B 9 180 2 9 18.2% 13.33
17 Brady DonaldsonClever C 9 180 0 12 0.0% 13.33
17 Hana MuseRichland 9 180 0 12 0.0% 13.33
20 Katie CrabtreeMountain Grove 9 180 2 8 20.0% 12.22
20 Draven GravesThayer A 9 180 0 11 0.0% 12.22
22 Rory DahmsSalem B 9 180 0 10 0.0% 11.11
23 Emma DragooParkview 9 180 1 8 11.1% 10.56
23 Skarleth PerezParkview 9 180 1 8 11.1% 10.56
25 Michael KaiserRichland 9 120 0 6 0.0% 10.00
26 Jayden PattersonThayer A 9 180 1 7 12.5% 9.44
27 Joslyne TroutGainesville 9 180 0 8 0.0% 8.89
28 Tymber HolmanThayer B 9 180 0 7 0.0% 7.78
29 Corwin MullinsThayer B 9 180 1 5 16.7% 7.22
30 Stephanie PerezParkview 9 180 0 5 0.0% 5.56
31 Yasmine BrayGainesville 9 180 0 4 0.0% 4.44
32 Bryson ColsonMountain Grove 9 150 1 1 50.0% 3.33
33 Aiyden ArgentGainesville 9 180 0 2 0.0% 2.22
33 Egypt RichardThayer B 9 180 0 2 0.0% 2.22
35 Chase AncellRichland 9 120 0 1 0.0% 1.67
36 Taylor WilliamsMountain Grove 3 30 0 0 0.0% 0.00

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read