2020 Cal Classic

Date:	Saturday, November 14, 2020
Sponsor:	Northern California Quiz Bowl Alliance (Richmond, CA)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Competitive Division: IS-197

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2021 High School National Championship Tournament.
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Stanford Online	8–0	100.0%	4135	160	70	38	11	25.56	516.88
2	Mission San Jose A	7–1	87.5%	4125	160	75	32	16	25.79	515.62
3	Eriksen A	5–2	71.4%	2570	140	37	35	11	23.89	367.14
3	Saratoga A	4–3	57.1%	2610	140	52	21	28	24.11	372.86
5	Mira Loma	5–2	71.4%	2850	140	53	24	27	25.32	407.14
5	Mission San Jose B	5–2	71.4%	2825	140	44	38	13	22.56	403.57
7	Homestead	3–4	42.9%	2300	140	35	32	7	22.24	328.57
7	Dublin	2–5	28.6%	1685	140	16	39	11	20.18	240.71
9	Lowell A	5–2	71.4%	2560	140	34	37	16	24.79	365.71
10	Sagittarius B	4–3	57.1%	2530	140	36	41	14	21.43	361.43
11	Sagittarius A	3–4	42.9%	2075	140	35	29	16	20.94	296.43
12	Davis A	2–5	28.6%	1565	140	14	40	9	18.52	223.57
13	Amador Valley A	4–3	57.1%	2470	140	30	48	14	20.64	352.86
14	Folsom	3–4	42.9%	2050	140	23	40	13	21.75	292.86
15	Harker A	3–4	42.9%	1970	140	23	43	15	19.24	281.43
16	Gunn A	1–6	14.3%	1655	140	16	38	5	19.63	236.43
17	Cupertino Scholars A	4–3	57.1%	1940	140	25	32	21	23.68	277.14
18	Saint Francis A	2–5	28.6%	1805	140	24	32	9	20.89	257.86
19	Vista Del Lago A	1–6	14.3%	1445	140	27	25	18	16.92	206.43
20	Evergreen Valley A	0–7	0.0%	1335	140	23	24	24	18.51	190.71

The highlighted team qualified for the 2021 Small School National Championship Tournament (Open Division).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Mission San Jose C	8–1	88.9%	3275	181	54	46	27	21.62	361.88
2	Eriksen B	8–1	88.9%	2910	180	52	53	24	16.38	323.33
3	BASIS Silicon Valley	5–3	62.5%	2835	161	36	56	19	19.89	352.17
3	Washington A	5–3	62.5%	2710	160	43	40	15	20.96	338.75
5	Bellarmine College Prep	6–1	85.7%	2710	140	43	39	9	20.98	387.14
5	Harker B	6–1	85.7%	2530	140	17	62	7	21.39	361.43
5	Churchill Middle	5–2	71.4%	2700	140	47	37	19	20.48	385.71
5	Saratoga B	5–2	71.4%	2590	140	30	57	10	18.62	370.00
9	Davis B	4–2	66.7%	1430	120	15	39	5	15.56	238.33
10	Saint Francis B	3–3	50.0%	1790	120	15	47	5	18.06	298.33
11	Campolindo A	3–3	50.0%	1040	120	8	36	8	13.64	173.33
12	Gunderson	2–4	33.3%	1660	120	23	35	15	17.93	276.67
13	Rio Americano	2–4	33.3%	1540	120	19	32	7	19.02	256.67
14	The King's Academy A	2–4	33.3%	1255	120	5	41	6	17.39	209.17
15	Amador Valley B	2–4	33.3%	1250	120	14	36	12	14.80	208.33
16	Fremont Christian	2–4	33.3%	970	120	4	36	4	14.25	161.67
17	Saint Francis C	1–5	16.7%	1120	120	7	35	9	16.90	186.67
18	Lowell B	1–5	16.7%	880	120	8	28	10	14.72	146.67
19	Washington B	0–6	0.0%	1310	120	22	30	12	14.23	218.33
20	Campolindo B	0–6	0.0%	680	120	6	28	8	10.29	113.33
21	Fremont JFK	0–6	0.0%	320	120	3	15	9	9.44	53.33

#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Saratoga C	7–1	87.5%	2385	160	7	72	10	20.38	298.12
2	Eriksen C	6–2	75.0%	2145	161	11	68	10	17.31	266.46
3	Challenger-Strawberry Park B	6–1	85.7%	2365	140	14	68	17	19.02	337.86
3	Foothill	5–2	71.4%	2160	140	18	58	8	17.76	308.57
5	Vista Del Lago C	5–2	71.4%	1860	140	7	61	7	17.35	265.71
5	Cupertino Scholars B	4–3	57.1%	1800	140	9	55	5	17.81	257.14
7	Vista Del Lago B	3–4	42.9%	1400	140	6	50	10	15.36	200.00
7	Gunn B	3–4	42.9%	1345	140	14	36	5	16.00	192.14
9	Challenger-Strawberry Park A	5–2	71.4%	2030	141	11	62	17	18.47	287.94
10	Lowell C	5–2	71.4%	1790	140	9	56	5	17.23	255.71
11	Mission San Jose E	3–4	42.9%	1475	140	11	50	20	14.92	210.71
12	Vista Del Lago D	2–5	28.6%	1500	140	6	53	2	15.08	214.29
13	San Mateo	4–3	57.1%	1755	141	13	53	10	16.36	248.94
14	Harker C	3–4	42.9%	1865	141	12	56	7	17.06	264.54
15	Davis C	2–5	28.6%	1405	140	5	48	10	16.98	200.71
16	The King's Academy B	1–6	14.3%	1180	140	6	44	2	13.20	168.57
17	Mission San Jose D	4–3	57.1%	1630	140	6	60	8	14.85	232.86
18	Amador Valley C	2–5	28.6%	1045	140	4	42	9	13.26	149.29
19	Evergreen Valley B	1–6	14.3%	515	140	1	26	8	10.37	73.57
20	Washington C	0–7	0.0%	905	140	3	33	4	15.28	129.29

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.