2013 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 12, 2013 – Saturday, April 13, 2013 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool 1
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Virginia A | 12–1 | 92.3% | 5415 | 294 | 66 |
112 |
21 | 19.16 | 368.37 |
---|
Yale | 12–1 | 92.3% | 5160 | 293 | 48 |
123 |
18 | 19.30 | 352.22 |
---|
Penn | 11–2 | 84.6% | 5325 | 296 | 65 |
107 |
32 | 20.00 | 359.80 |
---|
Illinois | 10–3 | 76.9% | 4815 | 293 | 53 |
116 |
26 | 17.69 | 328.67 |
---|
Minnesota A | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3985 | 296 | 28 |
122 |
23 | 16.40 | 269.26 |
---|
Michigan A | 8–5 | 61.5% | 4565 | 294 | 56 |
97 |
25 | 18.82 | 310.54 |
---|
Maryland | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3945 | 302 | 38 |
114 |
37 | 15.92 | 261.26 |
---|
Ohio State | 5–8 | 38.5% | 3410 | 297 | 23 |
112 |
25 | 15.33 | 229.63 |
---|
Pool 2
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
NYU | 11–2 | 84.6% | 4075 | 295 | 30 |
132 |
21 | 14.88 | 276.27 |
---|
Harvard | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3815 | 284 | 45 |
100 |
40 | 16.14 | 268.66 |
---|
MCTC | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3770 | 297 | 27 |
118 |
17 | 15.66 | 253.87 |
---|
Chicago A | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3715 | 293 | 44 |
96 |
39 | 16.36 | 253.58 |
---|
Alabama | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3320 | 279 | 25 |
107 |
27 | 15.23 | 237.99 |
---|
MIT | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3015 | 282 | 24 |
101 |
23 | 14.08 | 213.83 |
---|
Chicago B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3150 | 284 | 26 |
97 |
20 | 15.37 | 221.83 |
---|
Michigan State | 5–8 | 38.5% | 3050 | 292 | 22 |
96 |
16 | 15.59 | 208.90 |
---|
Pool 3
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
UC Berkeley | 9–4 | 69.2% | 3120 | 290 | 29 |
98 |
45 | 15.20 | 215.17 |
---|
Columbia | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3335 | 287 | 22 |
113 |
27 | 14.89 | 232.40 |
---|
Rice | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3360 | 296 | 15 |
125 |
27 | 14.43 | 227.03 |
---|
Virginia B | 6–7 | 46.2% | 3055 | 290 | 38 |
91 |
33 | 13.49 | 210.69 |
---|
VCU | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2280 | 285 | 6 |
101 |
16 | 12.12 | 160.00 |
---|
Texas A&M | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2125 | 286 | 20 |
82 |
31 | 11.37 | 148.60 |
---|
Cornell | 3–10 | 23.1% | 2090 | 291 | 9 |
90 |
29 | 12.12 | 143.64 |
---|
Delaware | 2–11 | 15.4% | 1730 | 293 | 7 |
88 |
15 | 8.63 | 118.09 |
---|
Pool 4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Ottawa | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2625 | 289 | 25 |
94 |
32 | 12.35 | 181.66 |
---|
Michigan B | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2205 | 275 | 14 |
91 |
29 | 11.71 | 160.36 |
---|
UCF | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2165 | 272 | 15 |
89 |
20 | 11.06 | 159.19 |
---|
WUSTL | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2220 | 288 | 14 |
96 |
30 | 10.91 | 154.17 |
---|
Minnesota B | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1685 | 285 | 9 |
79 |
28 | 10.23 | 118.25 |
---|
McMaster | 2–11 | 15.4% | 1250 | 298 | 10 |
61 |
14 | 7.89 | 83.89 |
---|
Buffalo | 2–11 | 15.4% | 1110 | 297 | 6 |
63 |
14 | 6.67 | 74.75 |
---|
Truman State | 1–12 | 7.7% | 1485 | 283 | 9 |
71 |
8 | 8.50 | 104.95 |
---|
Division II Pool 1/2
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Stanford | 13–0 | 100.0% | 7480 | 304 | 96 |
121 |
29 | 22.93 | 492.11 |
---|
Yale | 11–2 | 84.6% | 5320 | 278 | 70 |
94 |
32 | 21.28 | 382.73 |
---|
Chicago A | 11–2 | 84.6% | 5580 | 299 | 64 |
119 |
54 | 20.22 | 373.24 |
---|
Harvard | 9–4 | 69.2% | 5185 | 301 | 52 |
113 |
35 | 20.91 | 344.52 |
---|
Illinois | 9–4 | 69.2% | 4555 | 281 | 44 |
110 |
24 | 18.93 | 324.20 |
---|
Williams | 8–5 | 61.5% | 4090 | 297 | 33 |
115 |
49 | 18.18 | 275.42 |
---|
Chipola | 7–6 | 53.8% | 4290 | 305 | 62 |
91 |
31 | 17.03 | 281.31 |
---|
MIT | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3680 | 304 | 37 |
100 |
30 | 16.61 | 242.11 |
---|
Pool 3/4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Kenyon | 10–3 | 76.9% | 3805 | 295 | 21 |
126 |
27 | 16.09 | 257.97 |
---|
Western Kentucky | 9–4 | 69.2% | 4355 | 297 | 27 |
128 |
20 | 17.87 | 293.27 |
---|
Centre | 8–5 | 61.5% | 3670 | 300 | 30 |
113 |
34 | 15.80 | 244.67 |
---|
Louisville | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3605 | 284 | 22 |
115 |
25 | 16.42 | 253.87 |
---|
WUSTL | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3855 | 307 | 50 |
97 |
38 | 15.82 | 251.14 |
---|
Cornell | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3390 | 279 | 33 |
104 |
16 | 14.12 | 243.01 |
---|
Ohio State | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2725 | 295 | 25 |
89 |
21 | 13.73 | 184.75 |
---|
Chicago B | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2595 | 303 | 18 |
95 |
24 | 13.23 | 171.29 |
---|
Pool 5/6
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Toronto | 10–3 | 76.9% | 3300 | 295 | 18 |
122 |
24 | 13.79 | 223.73 |
---|
Valencia | 7–6 | 53.8% | 3255 | 291 | 28 |
110 |
37 | 13.91 | 223.71 |
---|
Michigan | 7–6 | 53.8% | 2905 | 298 | 18 |
104 |
21 | 13.93 | 194.97 |
---|
Washington | 6–7 | 46.2% | 2785 | 269 | 19 |
104 |
20 | 12.68 | 207.06 |
---|
Michigan State | 5–8 | 38.5% | 2645 | 288 | 16 |
101 |
27 | 13.08 | 183.68 |
---|
Jefferson CC | 4–9 | 30.8% | 2305 | 288 | 16 |
87 |
28 | 12.96 | 160.07 |
---|
Lawrence | 4–9 | 30.8% | 1955 | 286 | 15 |
82 |
24 | 10.62 | 136.71 |
---|
Redlands CC | 3–10 | 23.1% | 1695 | 276 | 5 |
85 |
30 | 10.22 | 122.83 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read