2021 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Saturday, April 10, 2021 |
Division I Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Chicago A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2375 | 143 | 16 |
65 |
15 | 19.50 | 332.17 |
---|
Texas A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2330 | 143 | 19 |
69 |
11 | 16.40 | 325.87 |
---|
MIT A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1525 | 140 | 9 |
54 |
18 | 14.92 | 217.86 |
---|
Brown | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1430 | 140 | 14 |
46 |
26 | 14.83 | 204.29 |
---|
Penn State | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1205 | 140 | 7 |
47 |
14 | 12.96 | 172.14 |
---|
WUSTL A | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1380 | 140 | 8 |
52 |
20 | 14.00 | 197.14 |
---|
UC Davis | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1225 | 140 | 9 |
42 |
16 | 14.71 | 175.00 |
---|
Florida B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 820 | 140 | 4 |
36 |
4 | 10.50 | 117.14 |
---|
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Florida A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2265 | 140 | 18 |
64 |
11 | 17.20 | 323.57 |
---|
Harvard A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2195 | 140 | 19 |
60 |
16 | 17.59 | 313.57 |
---|
Maryland A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2110 | 140 | 18 |
61 |
16 | 16.58 | 301.43 |
---|
Cambridge | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1675 | 140 | 12 |
52 |
7 | 15.78 | 239.29 |
---|
Columbia B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1480 | 140 | 6 |
55 |
12 | 14.75 | 211.43 |
---|
WUSTL B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 800 | 140 | 7 |
34 |
23 | 11.46 | 114.29 |
---|
Rutgers A | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1110 | 140 | 9 |
40 |
19 | 13.67 | 158.57 |
---|
Michigan A | 1–6 | 14.3% | 945 | 140 | 4 |
36 |
11 | 14.50 | 135.00 |
---|
Pool C
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Illinois A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2550 | 140 | 19 |
69 |
17 | 18.86 | 364.29 |
---|
Stanford | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2410 | 140 | 22 |
62 |
16 | 18.33 | 344.29 |
---|
Yale | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2015 | 140 | 14 |
60 |
23 | 17.84 | 287.86 |
---|
Georgia Tech A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1760 | 140 | 15 |
58 |
19 | 14.38 | 251.43 |
---|
Northwestern A | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1575 | 140 | 6 |
61 |
17 | 14.33 | 225.00 |
---|
Harvard B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 955 | 140 | 8 |
36 |
13 | 12.27 | 136.43 |
---|
Illinois B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 860 | 140 | 3 |
36 |
1 | 11.79 | 122.86 |
---|
Oregon | 0–7 | 0.0% | 645 | 140 | 5 |
28 |
14 | 10.91 | 92.14 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Ohio State | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2200 | 140 | 17 |
68 |
21 | 16.12 | 314.29 |
---|
Columbia A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2165 | 140 | 19 |
58 |
20 | 18.18 | 309.29 |
---|
UC Berkeley A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2110 | 140 | 16 |
64 |
18 | 16.50 | 301.43 |
---|
Princeton | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1160 | 140 | 8 |
43 |
10 | 12.94 | 165.71 |
---|
Chicago B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1290 | 140 | 4 |
52 |
16 | 14.11 | 184.29 |
---|
Texas B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1135 | 140 | 3 |
49 |
20 | 13.46 | 162.14 |
---|
Indiana | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1035 | 140 | 1 |
45 |
6 | 13.04 | 147.86 |
---|
Minnesota A | 1–6 | 14.3% | 995 | 140 | 5 |
39 |
14 | 13.64 | 142.14 |
---|
Division II Pool AA
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read