2013 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 12, 2013 – Saturday, April 13, 2013 |
Host: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3225 | 160 | 29 |
73 |
10 | 20.69 | 403.12 |
---|
Minnesota A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2450 | 157 | 18 |
76 |
10 | 15.64 | 312.10 |
---|
Chicago B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1775 | 150 | 15 |
53 |
8 | 15.59 | 236.67 |
---|
Michigan State | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1615 | 155 | 13 |
49 |
10 | 15.81 | 208.39 |
---|
Columbia | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1565 | 149 | 10 |
54 |
13 | 14.69 | 210.07 |
---|
VCU | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1260 | 150 | 4 |
54 |
4 | 11.72 | 168.00 |
---|
Ottawa | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1070 | 153 | 12 |
38 |
16 | 11.80 | 139.87 |
---|
UCF | 1–6 | 14.3% | 925 | 144 | 5 |
40 |
14 | 11.56 | 128.47 |
---|
Pool C
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Illinois | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2935 | 156 | 33 |
70 |
12 | 17.48 | 376.28 |
---|
Penn | 6–1 | 85.7% | 3065 | 159 | 39 |
61 |
18 | 19.60 | 385.53 |
---|
MIT | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1790 | 152 | 16 |
56 |
12 | 14.58 | 235.53 |
---|
Alabama | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1765 | 150 | 12 |
58 |
15 | 15.43 | 235.33 |
---|
Texas A&M | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1020 | 153 | 9 |
41 |
17 | 11.20 | 133.33 |
---|
Cornell | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1090 | 153 | 8 |
42 |
14 | 12.40 | 142.48 |
---|
Michigan B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1000 | 146 | 8 |
42 |
18 | 11.00 | 136.99 |
---|
Minnesota B | 0–7 | 0.0% | 705 | 153 | 5 |
33 |
16 | 10.00 | 92.16 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Michigan A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2650 | 158 | 31 |
59 |
11 | 18.33 | 335.44 |
---|
Maryland | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2495 | 163 | 21 |
73 |
20 | 16.49 | 306.13 |
---|
MCTC | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2280 | 160 | 16 |
69 |
8 | 16.35 | 285.00 |
---|
NYU | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2185 | 159 | 20 |
68 |
13 | 14.43 | 274.84 |
---|
Rice | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1820 | 164 | 8 |
67 |
10 | 14.40 | 221.95 |
---|
Virginia B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1575 | 160 | 23 |
41 |
18 | 14.22 | 196.88 |
---|
WUSTL | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1060 | 157 | 8 |
42 |
16 | 12.00 | 135.03 |
---|
Buffalo | 0–7 | 0.0% | 475 | 163 | 4 |
27 |
9 | 6.13 | 58.28 |
---|
Division II Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3165 | 139 | 43 |
55 |
14 | 20.82 | 455.40 |
---|
Illinois | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2465 | 139 | 19 |
67 |
13 | 18.31 | 354.68 |
---|
Louisville | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1780 | 142 | 10 |
58 |
14 | 16.47 | 250.70 |
---|
Cornell | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1645 | 140 | 17 |
48 |
8 | 14.62 | 235.00 |
---|
Washington | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1585 | 138 | 13 |
53 |
8 | 13.64 | 229.71 |
---|
Redlands CC | 2–5 | 28.6% | 730 | 142 | 3 |
35 |
13 | 10.53 | 102.82 |
---|
Minnesota | 1–6 | 14.3% | 300 | 136 | 0 |
23 |
3 | 3.70 | 44.12 |
---|
Notre Dame | 0–7 | 0.0% | | | | | | | |
---|
Pool C
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Harvard | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3070 | 159 | 28 |
69 |
20 | 21.24 | 386.16 |
---|
Chicago A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 3130 | 161 | 28 |
79 |
26 | 19.16 | 388.82 |
---|
WUSTL | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2095 | 165 | 27 |
49 |
22 | 17.24 | 253.94 |
---|
Toronto | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1570 | 161 | 9 |
57 |
7 | 13.64 | 195.03 |
---|
Ohio State | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1505 | 157 | 13 |
51 |
12 | 13.44 | 191.72 |
---|
Valencia | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1615 | 156 | 16 |
52 |
15 | 13.68 | 207.05 |
---|
Carleton College | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1085 | 160 | 4 |
49 |
7 | 10.75 | 135.62 |
---|
Lamar-Orange | 0–7 | 0.0% | 535 | 153 | 2 |
32 |
4 | 6.03 | 69.93 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Chipola | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2620 | 165 | 37 |
56 |
20 | 17.26 | 317.58 |
---|
MIT | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2390 | 166 | 27 |
65 |
20 | 15.60 | 287.95 |
---|
Western Kentucky | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2220 | 157 | 12 |
70 |
12 | 17.07 | 282.80 |
---|
Chicago B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1665 | 165 | 12 |
59 |
12 | 13.45 | 201.82 |
---|
Michigan | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1520 | 163 | 8 |
54 |
8 | 14.52 | 186.50 |
---|
Northwestern | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1445 | 155 | 7 |
53 |
10 | 14.33 | 186.45 |
---|
Jefferson CC | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1200 | 155 | 12 |
42 |
21 | 13.06 | 154.84 |
---|
UCF | 0–7 | 0.0% | 790 | 160 | 9 |
31 |
9 | 9.75 | 98.75 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read