NAQT Northeast Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 7, 2015
Host: Columbia University (New York, NY)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I: SCT-15

# UG TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A Penn A9–0100.0%533021473 80 2723.33498.13
2A MIT A6–366.7%409021349 82 2520.31384.04
3A 1B Yale A8–188.9%380521237 87 2020.00358.96
4A 2 Harvard A6–366.7%326020724 84 1419.72314.98
5A NYU A5–455.6%285021126 75 3218.51270.14
5 3 Columbia5–455.6%237521024 69 1415.00226.19
7 4 Penn B3–633.3%187020414 62 2515.33183.33
8 5 Cornell A2–722.2%171020611 64 1713.20166.02
9 6 Penn C0–90.0%8402086 37 2812.0980.77
10 7 Yale B1–811.1%10252118 46 179.8197.16

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II: SCT-15DII (shares with SCT-15)

# TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 MIT B10–190.9%520525568 80 3223.95408.24
2 Princeton10–190.9%528526061 94 2823.03406.54
3 Yale C8–372.7%510025567 85 2322.11400.00
3 Amherst A8–372.7%454525569 71 3421.21356.47
3 Cornell B8–372.7%426024862 81 3318.78343.55
6 NYU B6–554.5%321524751 58 4018.99260.32
7 Vassar5–645.5%333524641 71 1718.71271.14
8 Harvard B4–736.4%410025353 74 4121.81324.11
8 Rutgers4–736.4%343025546 72 1617.80269.02
10 Hamilton2–918.2%206525219 59 915.83163.89
11 Boston College1–109.1%166025523 48 4815.14130.20
12 Amherst B0–110.0%148524513 46 1014.92121.22

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read