2009 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 3, 2009 – Saturday, April 4, 2009 |
Location: |
Hyatt Regency DFW (Dallas, TX) |
Division I Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Chicago A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2830 | 161 | 21 |
81 |
14 | 17.40 | 351.55 |
---|
Dartmouth | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2030 | 170 | 15 |
67 |
13 | 14.63 | 238.82 |
---|
Maryland | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1665 | 170 | 17 |
55 |
28 | 13.89 | 195.88 |
---|
Georgia | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1120 | 165 | 7 |
51 |
8 | 9.40 | 135.76 |
---|
Toronto | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1650 | 163 | 11 |
61 |
21 | 13.61 | 202.45 |
---|
Michigan | 2–5 | 28.6% | 960 | 164 | 7 |
49 |
15 | 7.86 | 117.07 |
---|
Tulsa | 1–6 | 14.3% | 855 | 173 | 8 |
42 |
6 | 6.90 | 98.84 |
---|
Illinois B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 780 | 168 | 6 |
40 |
10 | 7.39 | 92.86 |
---|
Pool B
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Illinois A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2895 | 169 | 17 |
95 |
26 | 16.25 | 342.60 |
---|
MIT | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1640 | 165 | 23 |
56 |
18 | 10.44 | 198.79 |
---|
Carleton College | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2075 | 166 | 13 |
78 |
9 | 12.58 | 250.00 |
---|
UCLA | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1350 | 157 | 6 |
61 |
18 | 11.04 | 171.97 |
---|
Minnesota B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1250 | 162 | 9 |
54 |
18 | 10.56 | 154.32 |
---|
Princeton | 1–6 | 14.3% | 625 | 168 | 5 |
34 |
16 | 7.44 | 74.40 |
---|
Oklahoma | 1–6 | 14.3% | 610 | 171 | 2 |
35 |
8 | 7.30 | 71.35 |
---|
Tulane | 1–6 | 14.3% | 590 | 168 | 2 |
36 |
6 | 6.05 | 70.24 |
---|
Pool C
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Minnesota A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2580 | 149 | 26 |
69 |
16 | 16.63 | 346.31 |
---|
UC Irvine | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1690 | 140 | 14 |
55 |
6 | 13.91 | 241.43 |
---|
Harvard B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1575 | 155 | 15 |
61 |
10 | 10.39 | 203.23 |
---|
Florida State | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1295 | 145 | 8 |
53 |
13 | 11.64 | 178.62 |
---|
Texas | 3–4 | 42.9% | 755 | 137 | 3 |
39 |
8 | 8.57 | 110.22 |
---|
Penn | 1–6 | 14.3% | 540 | 68 | 3 |
25 |
11 | 10.71 | 158.82 |
---|
Alabama | 1–6 | 14.3% | 830 | 165 | 6 |
36 |
4 | 9.52 | 100.61 |
---|
Yale | 1–6 | 14.3% | 825 | 165 | 6 |
46 |
20 | 7.21 | 100.00 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Harvard A | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2625 | 166 | 26 |
71 |
23 | 16.91 | 316.27 |
---|
Stanford | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2130 | 154 | 10 |
75 |
11 | 15.12 | 276.62 |
---|
Chicago B | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1735 | 160 | 11 |
69 |
18 | 12.12 | 216.88 |
---|
Florida | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1755 | 162 | 13 |
63 |
19 | 13.49 | 216.67 |
---|
WUSTL | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1160 | 159 | 8 |
52 |
19 | 10.60 | 145.91 |
---|
Queen's | 2–5 | 28.6% | 790 | 169 | 9 |
40 |
17 | 7.08 | 93.49 |
---|
Cornell | 1–6 | 14.3% | 565 | 159 | 4 |
34 |
7 | 5.26 | 71.07 |
---|
Delaware | 0–7 | 0.0% | 400 | 161 | 3 |
22 |
9 | 7.20 | 49.69 |
---|
Division II Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2265 | 154 | 11 |
77 |
24 | 16.48 | 294.16 |
---|
Carleton College | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1775 | 162 | 11 |
67 |
13 | 13.40 | 219.14 |
---|
Davidson A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1435 | 150 | 5 |
62 |
10 | 11.79 | 191.33 |
---|
WUSTL | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1380 | 161 | 7 |
66 |
21 | 9.86 | 171.43 |
---|
Reynolds CC | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1015 | 160 | 3 |
53 |
4 | 8.21 | 126.88 |
---|
Gonzaga | 2–5 | 28.6% | 670 | 157 | 5 |
35 |
7 | 7.00 | 85.35 |
---|
Chipola B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 630 | 164 | 3 |
37 |
12 | 6.88 | 76.83 |
---|
Minnesota | 0–7 | 0.0% | 395 | 164 | 1 |
25 |
6 | 6.15 | 48.17 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read