NAQT Region 7 Sectional (Region 7)

Date:	Saturday, February 5, 2011
Host:	The Ohio State University (Columbus, OH)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Division I: SCT-11

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2011 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Michigan A	13–1	92.9%	5415	309	37	166	39	16.89	350.49
2	Carnegie Mellon A	11–3	78.6%	3730	300	22	136	31	13.89	248.67
3	Michigan B	10–3	76.9%	3680	283	27	131	43	13.89	260.07
4	Case Western A	6–7	46.2%	2350	281	13	105	18	10.13	167.26
4	Louisville B	6–7	46.2%	1680	297	5	86	31	9.89	113.13
6	Northern Kentucky	8–5	61.5%	2435	266	8	107	39	12.52	183.08
7	Louisville A	6–7	46.2%	1525	277	5	83	26	8.52	110.11
8	Miami-Ohio A	4–9	30.8%	1640	285	9	79	15	8.98	115.09
9	Cuyahoga CC	1–12	7.7%	1305	290	6	85	23	5.27	90.00
9	Bowling Green A	1–12	7.7%	890	280	1	64	9	4.31	63.57

Division II: SCT-11DII (shares with SCT-11)

Jump to Division I

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2011 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Michigan C	13–1	92.9%	5100	297	46	126	46	19.65	343.43
2	Ohio State A	11–2	84.6%	5920	280	42	137	24	22.57	422.86
3	Ohio State B	11–2	84.6%	5720	280	51	132	31	20.71	408.57
4	Pittsburgh A	9–3	75.0%	2635	244	14	93	22	15.00	215.98
5	Wooster A	8–4	66.7%	2740	248	17	92	9	14.77	220.97
6	Pittsburgh B	6–6	50.0%	2050	243	11	83	10	11.76	168.72
6	Case Western B	6–6	50.0%	2120	252	9	91	28	12.15	168.25
6	Louisville C	6–6	50.0%	2040	244	8	82	26	13.67	167.21
9	Carnegie Mellon B	4–8	33.3%	1570	245	4	71	7	11.13	128.16
10	Miami-Ohio B	3–9	25.0%	1365	259	7	62	22	10.87	105.41
11	Miami-Ohio C	2–10	16.7%	940	260	6	44	12	9.40	72.31
12	Bowling Green B	1–11	8.3%	665	257	3	38	8	6.83	51.75
13	Wooster B	0–12	0.0%	360	259	0	22	2	6.82	27.80

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.