NAQT New England Sectional (Region 1)

Date: Saturday, February 5, 2011
Host: Harvard University (Cambridge, MA)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Players are ranked by their PP20TUH (points per 20 tossups heard). Ties are broken by their power percentage (P%).

Division I: SCT-11

# Player Team GP TUH P TU I P% PP20TUH
1 John LawrenceYale A 10 240 29 31 2 48.3% 61.25
2 Guy TabachnickBrown 8 198 12 33 9 26.7% 46.97
3 James ShinnDartmouth A 10 237 12 34 8 26.1% 40.51
4 Ben CohenBrown 10 250 15 32 9 31.9% 40.00
5 Kevin KoaiYale A 10 240 10 32 5 23.8% 37.08
6 Ian EpplerBrown 8 198 8 25 2 24.2% 36.36
7 Danila KabotyanskiYale B 10 229 2 49 22 3.9% 35.81
8 Sam SpauldingYale A 10 240 7 25 6 21.9% 27.08
9 Daniel KleinBrown 7 175 6 11 2 35.3% 21.71
10 Justin ByrdBrown 7 179 2 16 3 11.1% 19.55
11 Leonard ChangDartmouth A 10 237 2 18 1 10.0% 17.30
12 JohnDartmouth A 10 237 2 14 5 12.5% 12.24
13 Zach BlattDartmouth A 10 237 3 9 2 25.0% 10.55
14 Benjamin HorowitzYale B 10 229 2 3 1 40.0% 4.80
15 David SteinbergYale B 10 229 1 2 3 33.3% 1.75

Division II: SCT-11DII (shares with SCT-11)

# Player Team GP TUH P TU I P% PP20TUH
1 Matthew JacksonYale C 11 259 60 60 9 50.0% 112.36
2 Stephen LiuHarvard 10 231 52 63 23 45.2% 112.12
3 Neil GurramMIT 11 255 62 57 24 52.1% 108.24
4 Kirk JingDartmouth B 10 219 15 29 6 34.1% 44.29
5 AnnaUConn B 10 222 2 36 2 5.3% 34.23
6 Isaac RabbaniBrandeis A 10 227 7 27 7 20.6% 29.96
7 David HuangMIT 11 255 12 21 2 36.4% 29.80
8 VuBrandeis A 10 227 6 28 7 17.6% 29.52
9 Seth KoproskiUConn A 10 225 2 33 7 5.7% 28.89
10 Ashvin SrivatsaYale C 11 259 15 10 5 60.0% 23.17
11 Miriam GoldmanBrandeis B 10 218 2 21 3 8.7% 20.64
12 StefanDartmouth B 10 219 0 17 1 0.0% 15.07
13 Matthew PerreaultUConn A 10 225 2 13 2 13.3% 13.33
14 DravidDartmouth B 10 219 3 11 3 21.4% 12.79
15 MarisiaUConn B 10 222 4 10 4 28.6% 12.61
16 Stewart McDonaldYale C 11 259 4 13 7 23.5% 11.97
17 NateBrandeis B 10 218 1 12 1 7.7% 11.93
18 Joseph PinolaUConn A 10 225 1 12 2 7.7% 11.11
19 Stephen LehYale C 11 259 7 4 4 63.6% 9.65
20 Noah Lebowitz-LockardDartmouth B 10 219 2 8 1 20.0% 9.59
21 EmilyUConn B 10 222 2 8 2 20.0% 9.01
22 Ariel KayBrandeis A 10 227 1 8 3 11.1% 7.05
23 Alex MingeUConn A 10 225 1 6 1 14.3% 6.22
24 Lawrence ChiouHarvard 10 231 1 5 2 16.7% 4.76
25 Joshua AlmanMIT 11 255 2 2 0 50.0% 3.92
26 LindsayUConn B 10 222 0 4 0 0.0% 3.60
27 BerkBrandeis B 10 218 1 2 0 33.3% 3.21
28 Rosanne LibrettiBrandeis B 10 218 0 4 2 0.0% 2.75
29 Gil HenkinBrandeis A 10 227 0 2 0 0.0% 1.76

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read