Home
 About NAQT
 Members
 Rules
 Upcoming
Tournaments
 Hosting
 Results
 Statistics
  
 Newsletters
 Eligibility
 Jobs
 Links
 Contact Us
  
 How To...
 Sample
Questions
 Buy Practice
Questions
 You Gotta
Know...
 References
 Downloads
 Podcasts
  
 2008 ICT
 2009 CCCT
 2009 HS NCT

 
Standings Individuals Scoreboard Team Detail Individual Detail Stat Key
2005 NAQT ICT Division I Standings

Hellman


Team W L Pct PPG PAPG Mrg 15 10 -5 TUH PPTH P/N BHrd BPts P/B
1
Michigan A 13 0 1.000 436.5 147.3 289.2 46 150 34 312 18.19 1.35 196 3655 18.65
2
Chicago A 12 1 0.923 447.7 173.8 273.8 52 145 37 324 17.96 1.41 197 3775 19.16
3
Rochester 10 3 0.769 275.0 207.3 67.7 19 124 30 298 12.00 0.63 143 2200 15.38
4
Illinois A 9 4 0.692 335.8 202.3 133.5 46 117 34 310 14.08 1.35 163 2675 16.41
4
Stanford 9 4 0.692 255.8 227.3 28.5 11 129 18 305 10.90 0.61 140 1960 14.00
6
Berkeley 8 5 0.615 320.4 230.4 90.0 31 135 36 313 13.31 0.86 166 2530 15.24
7
Florida 6 7 0.462 224.2 280.4 -56.2 21 101 29 309 9.43 0.72 122 1735 14.22
7
Yale 6 7 0.462 202.3 254.2 -51.9 11 106 24 314 8.38 0.46 117 1525 13.03


Jackson


Team W L Pct PPG PAPG Mrg 15 10 -5 TUH PPTH P/N BHrd BPts P/B
9
VCU (UG) 9 4 0.692 266.9 211.9 55.0 18 131 15 311 11.16 1.20 149 1965 13.19
9
Princeton 9 4 0.692 237.3 200.8 36.5 14 121 35 299 10.32 0.40 135 1840 13.63
11
Carleton (UG)1 8 5 0.615 230.0 193.5 36.5 6 119 6 302 9.90 1.00 125 1740 13.92
11
Harvard (UG)1 8 5 0.615 225.8 197.7 28.1 10 130 44 307 9.56 0.23 140 1705 12.18
11
Emory 8 5 0.615 216.9 199.2 17.7 11 115 17 292 9.66 0.65 124 1590 12.82
14
South Florida A 7 6 0.538 241.2 199.2 41.9 17 112 17 298 10.52 1.00 129 1845 14.30
14
Michigan B 7 6 0.538 186.2 211.9 -25.8 16 97 36 299 8.09 0.44 113 1390 12.30
16
Vanderbilt 4 9 0.308 174.6 216.5 -41.9 7 102 29 294 7.72 0.24 109 1290 11.83

1-Carleton defeated Harvard 250-170 in a playoff for the right to contest the UG final.


Lafitte


Team W L Pct PPG PAPG Mrg 15 10 -5 TUH PPTH P/N BHrd BPts P/B
17
Rutgers-NB 9 4 0.692 215.4 198.8 16.5 9 121 5 297 9.43 1.80 130 1480 11.38
18
UCLA 7 6 0.538 231.2 197.3 33.8 12 112 27 301 9.98 0.44 124 1840 14.84
19
British Columbia 6 7 0.462 187.3 198.1 -10.8 11 99 22 307 7.93 0.50 110 1390 12.64
19
Williams (UG) 6 7 0.462 176.9 166.5 10.4 14 105 28 296 7.77 0.50 119 1180 9.92
21
Virginia 5 8 0.385 136.9 220.8 -83.8 3 92 30 308 5.78 0.10 95 965 10.16
22
Columbia 4 9 0.308 175.8 221.2 -45.4 12 91 24 306 7.47 0.50 103 1315 12.77
22
Maryland (UG) 4 9 0.308 145.4 211.2 -65.8 4 90 25 291 6.49 0.16 94 1055 11.22
22
Louisiana State 4 9 0.308 112.7 234.2 -121.5 10 75 30 313 4.68 0.33 85 715 8.41


Oliver


Team W L Pct PPG PAPG Mrg 15 10 -5 TUH PPTH P/N BHrd BPts P/B
25
Illinois B (UG) 7 6 0.538 174.6 181.9 -7.3 11 97 13 308 7.37 0.85 108 1200 11.11
26
Brandeis (UG) 6 7 0.462 151.5 193.5 -41.9 9 93 24 317 6.21 0.38 102 1025 10.05
27
Minnesota (UG) 5 8 0.385 135.8 187.3 -51.5 12 80 34 316 5.59 0.35 92 955 10.38
28
South Florida B 4 9 0.308 129.2 204.2 -75.0 8 88 31 317 5.30 0.26 96 835 8.70
28
Chicago B 4 9 0.308 115.4 225.0 -109.6 2 85 17 307 4.89 0.12 87 705 8.10
30
Swarthmore (UG) 3 10 0.231 150.8 186.2 -35.4 8 88 20 298 6.58 0.40 96 1060 11.04
31
Rice (UG) 1 12 0.077 101.2 233.1 -131.9 2 77 28 310 4.24 0.07 79 655 8.29
32
Valencia CC 0 13 0.000 46.5 250.0 -203.5 5 42 23 309 1.96 0.22 47 225 4.79



The NAQT website is maintained by Chad Kubicek